Oh Leandria You blessed me!!!!!!

if i never preach another letter of the gospel i will always have this.....

For the person who has everything

For the person who has everything.
We have so much and yet still cant find a balance of possession and happiness. Maybe where we are looking is not where we can find the satisfaction of the soul. Jesus gives us another direction to follow and another path to explore. At the feet of Jesus we find the perfect gift for the person who has everything.

Had to update to accommodate downloads
http://soundcloud.com/smissouri/for-the-person-who-has

For the person who has everything

http://smissouri.tumblr.com/post/71593040200/for-the-person-who-has-everything-we-have-so

Celebrate Christ

Reclaiming the spirit of Christmas can be difficult. Forces are pulling at us from every side in an attempt to compel us to worship; possessions, positions, and people. If we re-frame the conversation from a me centered to a we centered approach we could regain the wonder of worship and celebrate a Child called Christ. Celebrate Christ

Tackling Race Head-On To Expose A 'Dreadful Deceit'

Jacqueline Jones NPR interview

this is an interview from NPR with Jacqueline Jones concerning race. there a quite a few things contained therein that are troubling. But first i want to share my brother (Joshua Missouri) response to the piece  

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=249570019

Race is a social construct, but it is no less real than religion, or social status. Race is real because an over wheeling swath of society believes in differentiating people based on skin color. It’s not American, see Rwanda, it is absolutely European. Which I suppose is why women were to be fair and white or why Sicilians are believed to be darker and therefor less civilized. It is our failing for not seeking truth and our forefathers for allowing it to be distorted - Joshua Missouri 

I will be posting my response to the interview a bit later 

Scandal: the suffering and endurance model of YOLO

     Reflecting on the episode last night i must say that i was troubled. the immersive world that Scandal has created Parry's between the models of suffering and endurance and a morphed redemptive model.  from a pure classical approach it is a recognition of seedtime and harvest. Quinn being seduced by gratuitous violence falls prey to the wilds of her own imagination. 

     The seed is Quinn wading into the world of violence... the harvest is eventually the violence that we glorify is the violence that overtakes us. 

She desires to test the waters of the violence that has been dealt to her on others. the irony is she has a Stockholm syndrome like affinity for Huck and his tormented life.  But lets not forget Quinn was a baby to this world of fetishized violence from season 1 to now we see how violence like any other behavior is learned embraced as a necessary evil and then fetishiezed. 

Living in a world where we are born into pain. taught that pain and violence is necessary and when the mind is conditioned to believe that pain is a reality pain will become the obsession . This is the world that faithful people live in. 

One year ago 26 children and adults died in a school shooting in newtown Connecticut. And one year later we have not found the courage to pass assault weapon legislation's. since that shooting we have had 2 additional mass shootings and yet lack courage to effect change.

This is the world faithful people live.

Catholic priest James Allison suggest that in this world of memetic violence Jesus directing us toward another way to be. Allison suggest that the crucifixion is more than payment but a paradigm shift.  A way of mindfulness versus the human proclivity for revenge and pain. Jesus says from the cross... "forgive them father for they know not what they do"...

Below is a link to Exploring the New Paradigm: Giraud and the Christianity of the 21st

 Century

http://www.jamesalison.co.uk/pdf/James-Alison-Brian-McLaren-COVandR-transcript.pdf

The problem with my own personal Jesus

     One of the issues that beguile me is the idea of personal theology that only influences public policy when it accommodates your particular parties’ talking points. When my conservative brothers and sisters drag out the big moral 3 of; Gay marriage, abortion , and access to contraceptives with the idea that these encapsulate all of evangelical theology i get a little uneasy.  The Big 3 have been the moralistic talking points of conservatives for the last 30 years. Not just for conservative evangelicals but conservative Catholics as well. What we lose in the fetishzation of the big 3 is the message of the Gospel. 

 

     It’s easy to scapegoat "baby killers" and "homosexuals" as enemies of Christ and persist that we are followers of Christ because you enjoy hetero normative orientation. But when it comes to the reciprocative nature of this statement "as you do to the least of these you do unto me" we might find that we are not following the Christ of the gospels but rather a "christ" of our existential crisis.  It’s easier to run to the cubby holes of racist, misogynistic and homophobic certitude rather than cast our nets into the muck that is uncertainty.  Our uncertainty is that we don't always know what Jesus would do confronted with all the challenges that modernity brings ... but we are still tasked to do what he told us to do "love your neighbor as yourself."

     How do we construct an ideological framework where it’s ok to cut money for welfare but find money for warfare? How can we gather the political will to shut down the entire government in pursuit of restricting access to health care for others? How do we keep arguing about legitimate rape and magical uteri that only procreate with sperm produced from consensual sex? How are the people who use such language able to call themselves Christians? What part of the Christian ethic is the NRA and conservatism Christian value aligned? When children die at school and we are crippled by moral impotence to take action; are we still suffering little children to come unto him?  How can we take part in a corrupt system and still use the moniker "in God we trust"? 

    

     We are able to hide behind a form of godliness because we don't see these social ills as a reflection of our faithfulness to God. We don't see participation in corrupt systems as sin. We don't understand sin as a failure to provide comfort and care; we see sin as a failure of personal morality. As long as we are personally moral and treat our immediate connections "right" than we are living a faithful life.  If we have possessions and others do not that’s not a reflection of sinfulness but rather a reflection of our ability to make prudent decisions. (Whatever you do don't think about AIG, Bear Stearns, so forth so on we all know what great decisions they made) The ability to be callous and Christian is a byproduct of the privatization of Jesus.  When you privatize Jesus you abdicate the Christian responsibility to seek the peace and prosperity of the city. 

  

     When you take the walk; take the preachers hand and take Jesus into your heart. We say "Jesus i make you my personal lord and savior and i trust you to guide Me." i am an absolute proponent for "personal decisions for Christ" but we are consistently missing a step the point of salvation is not for me to have a narcissistic boutique experience with God. I am not just having a concierge experience with God where he desires the best for only me. My faithfulness to God is both a private and public declaration and demonstration. 

   Faithfulness is a private affirmation.  Faithfulness is not a function of prudent budget decisions that brutalize the poor but bail out the rich. Faithfulness has to at least reflect an Christological ethic to still be considered Christian. I mean you have to at least look like you are trying to follow Jesus right?  You can't use piss poor biblical scholarship to justify an ethic that is antithetical to Christ teachings.  You cannot say that cutting food stamps is empowerment, but bailing out Fannie Mae is improvement. Such a fallacy is a clear sign that the Jesus that we profess is not the Jesus we proclaim.  Somehow, somewhere somebody has been lying on my Jesus framing him as a savior to my soul but not a savior to society. 

    

     Following Jesus is not about pulling myself up by my own bootstraps, but pushing somebody else up so they might be what he would have them to be. Following Jesus is not an experiment in self-actualization but rather an experiment in inclusion. How much room can i make for the existence of others?  There my friend is the fly in the ointment; Christ is not creating an environment of homogeneity but rather heterogeneity.  My suspicion is that God is far more diverse than the blue eyed Jesus from granny's picture in the living room. I also suspect that the kingdom ethic that we tote around like a bruised banana, is far more public than saying prayers on the capitol steps, and praying that God repeal Obamacare. 

    

     Since Benny Hinn's dance card is full it’s probably helpful that people can make it to the doctor if they can't make it to the crusade.  Here is an idea lets have Ted Cruz whip out the EVOO (extra virgin olive oil) and go from hospital to hospital making it rain healings on the poor and disenfranchised. As a matter of fact let’s bring out Sarah Palin and have her pray over some knotted prayer cloths and send them to all the residents of the states that have the fewest residents with health insurance coverage.  Ok let’s try this ... next Sunday lets have no preaching ... just blood pressure and diabetes screenings. I promise you the altar call would look vastly different when you set up I.V's in the pulpit.  

My problem with the idea of "your own personal Jesus"

 1) Personal Jesus is content to heal you and let your neighbor die and you are ok with that. 

2) Personal Jesus is far more interested in blessing you privately than making you an agent for systemic change

3) Personal Jesus seems to Love white men most of all 

4) Personal Jesus is really not "into" caring for others

5) Personal Jesus loves huge buildings 

6) Personal Jesus has way too many benefits for buildings but never any offerings for the afflicted

7) Personal Jesus does not believe in global warming in fact he likes the temp just fine

8) Personal Jesus is an uber capitalist 

9) Personal Jesus not only Pulled himself up by his own bootstraps he also made the bootstraps 

10) Personal Jesus apparently was just kidding about the whole "orphan widow and stranger” thing

I don’t have a problem with Personal Jesus being all up in your heart but I also want his heart to be a reflection of what we do with our hands. But that might hurt a little!